Modelling and simulation of intensified absorber for post-combustion CO₂ capture using different mass transfer correlations

This paper studied mass transfer in rotating packed bed (RPB) which has the potential to significantly reduce capital and operating costs in post-combustion CO₂capture. To model intensified absorber, mass transfer correlations were implemented in visual FORTRAN and then were dynamically linked with Aspen Plus® rate-based model. Therefore, this represents a newly developed model for intensified absorber using RPB. Two sets of mass transfer correlations were studied and compared through model validations. The second set of correlations performed better at the MEA concentrations tested as compared with the first set of correlations. For insights into the design and operation of intensified absorber, process analysis was carried out, which indicates: (a) With fixed RPB equipment size and fixed Lean MEA flow rate, CO₂ capture level decreases with increase in flue gas flow rate; (b) Higher lean MEA inlet temperature leads to higher CO₂ capture level. (c) At higher flue gas temperature (from 30 °C to 80 °C), the CO₂ capture level of the intensified absorber can be maintained. Compared with conventional absorber using packed columns, the insights obtained from this study are (1) Intensified absorber using rotating packed bed (RPB) improves mass transfer significantly. (2) Cooling duty cost can be saved since higher lean MEA temperature and/or higher flue gas temperature shows little or no effect on the performance of the RPB

Process analysis of intensified absorber for post-combustion CO₂ capture through modelling and simulation

Process intensification (PI) has the potential to significantly reduce capital and operating costs in postcombustion CO₂ capture using monoethanolamine (MEA) solvent for power plants. The intensified absorber using rotating packed bed (RPB) was modelled based on Aspen Plus® rate-based model, but some build-in correlations in Aspen Plus® rate-based model were replaced with new correlations suitable for RPB. These correlations reflect centrifugal acceleration which is present in RPB. The new correlations were implemented in visual FORTRAN as sub-routines and were dynamically linked to Aspen Plus® rate based model. The model for intensified absorber was validated using experimental data and showed good agreement. Process analysis carried out indicates: (a) CO₂ capture level increases with rotating speed. (b) Higher lean MEA inlet temperature leads to higher CO₂ capture level. (c) Increase in lean MEA concentration results in increase in CO₂ capture level. (d) Temperature bulge is not present in intensified absorber. Compared with conventional absorber using packed columns, the insights obtained from this study are (1) intensified absorber using RPB improves mass transfer significantly. (2) Higher flue gas temperature or lean MEA temperature will not be detrimental to the reactive separation as such cooling duty for flue gas can be saved. (3) Inter-cooling cost will not be incurred since there is no temperature bulge. A detail comparison between conventional absorber and intensified absorber using RPB was carried out and absorber volume reduction factor of 12 times was found. These insights can be useful for design and operation of intensified absorber for CO₂ capture

Study of absorber intercooling in solvent-based CO2 capture based on rotating packed bed technology

Application of process intensification (PI) technologies such as rotating packed beds (RPBs) to replace packed beds (PBs) in solvent-based CO2 capture could reduce plant footprint. Concentrated monoethanolamine (MEA) solvents are generally expected to be used in RPBs. Under this circumstance, expected temperature rise during CO2 absorption should be estimated to determine whether or not intercooling is necessary for RPBs. In this study, we demonstrated that intercooling is inevitable with RPBs using 40-70 wt% monoethanolamine (MEA) solvent through liquid phase energy balance for a hypothetical scenario. Our analysis showed that liquid phase temperature rise could be as high as 80°C in some cases and this will significantly reduce absorption rate without intercooling

Experimental study of CO2 solubility in high concentration MEA solution for intensified solvent-based carbon capture

The solvent-based carbon capture process is the most matured and economical route for decarbonizing the power sector. In this process, aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA) is commonly used as the solvent for CO2 scrubbing from power plant and industrial flue gases. Generally, aqueous MEA with 30 wt% (or less) concentration is considered the benchmark solvent. The CO2 solubility data in aqueous MEA solution, used for modelling of the vapour-liquid equilibria (VLE) of CO2 in MEA solutions, are widely published for 30 wt% (or less) concentration. Aqueous MEA with higher concentrations (from 40 to 100 wt%) is considered in solvent-based carbon capture designs with techniques involving process intensification (PI). PI techniques could improve the process economics and operability of solvent-based carbon capture. Developing PI for application in capture process requires CO2 solubility data for concentrated MEA solutions. These data are however limited in literature. The modelling of the vapour-liquid equilibria (VLE) of CO2 in MEA solutions for PI-based solvent capture techniques involving stronger MEA solution of about 80 wt% concentration requires solubility data at the concentration. In this study, the data for 80 wt% MEA is presented for 40,60, 100 and 120oC. The experimental technique and analytical procedure in this study were validated by comparing the measurements for 30 wt% MEA with data from the literature. The data from this study can be fitted to VLE models such as electrolyte NRTL, extended UNIQUAC etc. which is an important component of solvent-based capture model using MEA as the solvent. More accurate VLE models will improve the prediction accuracy of capture level, rich loading etc. using PI-based solvent-based capture model

Process intensification for post combustion CO₂ capture with chemical absorption: a critical review

The concentration of CO₂ in the atmosphere is increasing rapidly. CO₂ emissions may have an impact on global climate change. Effective CO₂ emission abatement strategies such as carbon capture and storage (CCS) are required to combat this trend. Compared with pre-combustion carbon capture and oxy-fuel carbon capture approaches, post-combustion CO₂ capture (PCC) using solvent process is one of the most mature carbon capture technologies. There are two main barriers for the PCC process using solvent to be commercially deployed: (a) high capital cost; (b) high thermal efficiency penalty due to solvent regeneration. Applying process intensification (PI) technology into PCC with solvent process has the potential to significantly reduce capital costs compared with conventional technology using packed columns. This paper intends to evaluate different PI technologies for their suitability in PCC process. The study shows that rotating packed bed (RPB) absorber/stripper has attracted much interest due to its high mass transfer capability. Currently experimental studies on CO₂ capture using RPB are based on standalone absorber or stripper. Therefore a schematic process flow diagram of intensified PCC process is proposed so as to motivate other researches for possible optimal design, operation and control. To intensify heat transfer in reboiler, spinning disc technology is recommended. To replace cross heat exchanger in conventional PCC (with packed column) process, printed circuit heat exchanger will be preferred. Solvent selection for conventional PCC process has been studied extensively. However, it needs more studies for solvent selection in intensified PCC process. The authors also predicted research challenges in intensified PCC process and potential new breakthrough from different aspects

Effects of antiplatelet therapy on stroke risk by brain imaging features of intracerebral haemorrhage and cerebral small vessel diseases: subgroup analyses of the RESTART randomised, open-label trial

Background Findings from the RESTART trial suggest that starting antiplatelet therapy might reduce the risk of recurrent symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage compared with avoiding antiplatelet therapy. Brain imaging features of intracerebral haemorrhage and cerebral small vessel diseases (such as cerebral microbleeds) are associated with greater risks of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage. We did subgroup analyses of the RESTART trial to explore whether these brain imaging features modify the effects of antiplatelet therapy

Study of intercooling for rotating packed bed absorbers in intensified solvent-based CO2 capture process

Rotating packed beds (RPBs) are a compact and potentially more cost-effective alternative to packed beds for application in solvent-based carbon capture process. However, with concentrated monoethanolamine (MEA) (up to 70–80 wt%) as the solvent, there is a question as to whether intercooler is needed for the RPB absorbers and how to design and operate them. This study indicates that the liquid phase temperature could rise significantly and this makes it essential for RPB absorber to have intercoolers. This is further assessed using a validated RPB absorber model implemented in gPROMS ModelBuilder® by evaluating the impact of temperature on absorption performance. Different design options for RPB absorber intercoolers (stationary vs rotary) were introduced and their potential sizes and associated pressure drop were evaluated based on a large scale flue gas benchmark of a 250 MWe Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plant. This paper addresses a fundamental question about intercooling in RPB absorber and introduces strategies for the intercooler design

Effects of antiplatelet therapy after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage (RESTART): a randomised, open-label trial

Background: Antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of major vascular events for people with occlusive vascular disease, although it might increase the risk of intracranial haemorrhage. Patients surviving the commonest subtype of intracranial haemorrhage, intracerebral haemorrhage, are at risk of both haemorrhagic and occlusive vascular events, but whether antiplatelet therapy can be used safely is unclear. We aimed to estimate the relative and absolute effects of antiplatelet therapy on recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage and whether this risk might exceed any reduction of occlusive vascular events. Methods: The REstart or STop Antithrombotics Randomised Trial (RESTART) was a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, parallel-group trial at 122 hospitals in the UK. We recruited adults (≥18 years) who were taking antithrombotic (antiplatelet or anticoagulant) therapy for the prevention of occlusive vascular disease when they developed intracerebral haemorrhage, discontinued antithrombotic therapy, and survived for 24 h. Computerised randomisation incorporating minimisation allocated participants (1:1) to start or avoid antiplatelet therapy. We followed participants for the primary outcome (recurrent symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage) for up to 5 years. We analysed data from all randomised participants using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusted for minimisation covariates. This trial is registered with ISRCTN (number ISRCTN71907627). Findings: Between May 22, 2013, and May 31, 2018, 537 participants were recruited a median of 76 days (IQR 29–146) after intracerebral haemorrhage onset: 268 were assigned to start and 269 (one withdrew) to avoid antiplatelet therapy. Participants were followed for a median of 2·0 years (IQR [1·0– 3·0]; completeness 99·3%). 12 (4%) of 268 participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy had recurrence of intracerebral haemorrhage compared with 23 (9%) of 268 participants allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (adjusted hazard ratio 0·51 [95% CI 0·25–1·03]; p=0·060). 18 (7%) participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy experienced major haemorrhagic events compared with 25 (9%) participants allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (0·71 [0·39–1·30]; p=0·27), and 39 [15%] participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy had major occlusive vascular events compared with 38 [14%] allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (1·02 [0·65–1·60]; p=0·92). Interpretation: These results exclude all but a very modest increase in the risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage with antiplatelet therapy for patients on antithrombotic therapy for the prevention of occlusive vascular disease when they developed intracerebral haemorrhage. The risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage is probably too small to exceed the established benefits of antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention

Effects of antiplatelet therapy after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage (RESTART): a randomised, open-label trial

Background: Antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of major vascular events for people with occlusive vascular disease, although it might increase the risk of intracranial haemorrhage. Patients surviving the commonest subtype of intracranial haemorrhage, intracerebral haemorrhage, are at risk of both haemorrhagic and occlusive vascular events, but whether antiplatelet therapy can be used safely is unclear. We aimed to estimate the relative and absolute effects of antiplatelet therapy on recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage and whether this risk might exceed any reduction of occlusive vascular events. Methods: The REstart or STop Antithrombotics Randomised Trial (RESTART) was a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, parallel-group trial at 122 hospitals in the UK. We recruited adults (≥18 years) who were taking antithrombotic (antiplatelet or anticoagulant) therapy for the prevention of occlusive vascular disease when they developed intracerebral haemorrhage, discontinued antithrombotic therapy, and survived for 24 h. Computerised randomisation incorporating minimisation allocated participants (1:1) to start or avoid antiplatelet therapy. We followed participants for the primary outcome (recurrent symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage) for up to 5 years. We analysed data from all randomised participants using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusted for minimisation covariates. This trial is registered with ISRCTN (number ISRCTN71907627). Findings: Between May 22, 2013, and May 31, 2018, 537 participants were recruited a median of 76 days (IQR 29–146) after intracerebral haemorrhage onset: 268 were assigned to start and 269 (one withdrew) to avoid antiplatelet therapy. Participants were followed for a median of 2·0 years (IQR [1·0– 3·0]; completeness 99·3%). 12 (4%) of 268 participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy had recurrence of intracerebral haemorrhage compared with 23 (9%) of 268 participants allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (adjusted hazard ratio 0·51 [95% CI 0·25–1·03]; p=0·060). 18 (7%) participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy experienced major haemorrhagic events compared with 25 (9%) participants allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (0·71 [0·39–1·30]; p=0·27), and 39 [15%] participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy had major occlusive vascular events compared with 38 [14%] allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (1·02 [0·65–1·60]; p=0·92). Interpretation: These results exclude all but a very modest increase in the risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage with antiplatelet therapy for patients on antithrombotic therapy for the prevention of occlusive vascular disease when they developed intracerebral haemorrhage. The risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage is probably too small to exceed the established benefits of antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention

Effects of antiplatelet therapy after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage (RESTART): a randomised, open-label trial

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of major vascular events for people with occlusive vascular disease, although it might increase the risk of intracranial haemorrhage. Patients surviving the commonest subtype of intracranial haemorrhage, intracerebral haemorrhage, are at risk of both haemorrhagic and occlusive vascular events, but whether antiplatelet therapy can be used safely is unclear. We aimed to estimate the relative and absolute effects of antiplatelet therapy on recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage and whether this risk might exceed any reduction of occlusive vascular events. METHODS: The REstart or STop Antithrombotics Randomised Trial (RESTART) was a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, parallel-group trial at 122 hospitals in the UK. We recruited adults (≥18 years) who were taking antithrombotic (antiplatelet or anticoagulant) therapy for the prevention of occlusive vascular disease when they developed intracerebral haemorrhage, discontinued antithrombotic therapy, and survived for 24 h. Computerised randomisation incorporating minimisation allocated participants (1:1) to start or avoid antiplatelet therapy. We followed participants for the primary outcome (recurrent symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage) for up to 5 years. We analysed data from all randomised participants using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusted for minimisation covariates. This trial is registered with ISRCTN (number ISRCTN71907627). FINDINGS: Between May 22, 2013, and May 31, 2018, 537 participants were recruited a median of 76 days (IQR 29-146) after intracerebral haemorrhage onset: 268 were assigned to start and 269 (one withdrew) to avoid antiplatelet therapy. Participants were followed for a median of 2·0 years (IQR [1·0- 3·0]; completeness 99·3%). 12 (4%) of 268 participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy had recurrence of intracerebral haemorrhage compared with 23 (9%) of 268 participants allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (adjusted hazard ratio 0·51 [95% CI 0·25-1·03]; p=0·060). 18 (7%) participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy experienced major haemorrhagic events compared with 25 (9%) participants allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (0·71 [0·39-1·30]; p=0·27), and 39 [15%] participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy had major occlusive vascular events compared with 38 [14%] allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (1·02 [0·65-1·60]; p=0·92). INTERPRETATION: These results exclude all but a very modest increase in the risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage with antiplatelet therapy for patients on antithrombotic therapy for the prevention of occlusive vascular disease when they developed intracerebral haemorrhage. The risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage is probably too small to exceed the established benefits of antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention. FUNDING: British Heart Foundation